Information contained on this page is provided by an independent third-party content provider. WorldNow and this Station make no warranties or representations in connection therewith. If you have any questions or comments about this page please contact email@example.com.
SOURCE Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
SEATTLE, Jan. 28, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, a leading consumer-rights law firm has filed a class-action lawsuit against Target (NYSE: TGT) claiming the retail giant ignored warnings from as early as 2007 that the company's point-of-sale (POS) system was vulnerable to attack, a move that put more than 40 million credit and debit card records at risk and compromised the personal information of up to an additional 70 million customers after Target's systems were penetrated by attackers from on or about Nov. 27, 2013, through December 15, 2013.
The lawsuit, filed by Hagens Berman in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claims that security expert Dr. Neal Krawetz alerted Target and other major national retail chains about its vulnerability to attack in a white paper outlining POS vulnerabilities at major retailers. The white paper warned that security shortcomings in POS systems could put the financial information of consumers at risk.
The complaint alleges that a Target developer responsible for the retailer's POS system was sent the white paper, acknowledged receiving it, and requested permission to send it to other Target employees. Attorneys claim that the developer also described Dr. Krawetz's suggestions as "good ideas." However, the lawsuit claims, Target ultimately failed to implement Dr. Krawetz's proposed security fixes, and thus remained vulnerable to the attack that followed several years later.
"We plan to introduce evidence that shows that Target was aware its sales systems were vulnerable to precisely the kind of attack that happened during the 2013 holiday season," said Tom Loeser, a Hagens Berman Partner and former federal prosecutor in the Cyber and Intellectual Property Crimes Section of the U.S. Attorneys' Office in Los Angeles. "But the retail chain failed to act, which has resulted in more than 40 million compromised credit and debit card accounts as well as the release of up to 70 million customer records including names, addresses, phone numbers and email addresses."
The lawsuit also claims that Target was likely not compliant with industry standards for security, such as the PCI Data Security Standard ("PCI DSS"). For instance, the suit quotes an analyst who notes that three-digit CVV codes must have been stored in order for them to have been stolen, but storing CVV codes is a practice long banned by the PCI.
Attorneys allege that in addition to negligence prior to the security breach, Target repeatedly misled its customers about the nature and scale of the breach. For instance, the suit claims that Target initially stated that customers' PIN numbers were not compromised, but later disclosed that the data had, in fact, been taken. Attorneys also claim that Target initially estimated only 40 million accounts were affected, but later appeared to state that in addition to account information for 40 million charge cards, the personal information of 70 million customers was also compromised. Customers whose charge account information was compromised, and whose personal information, such as name, address, phone number, and email were also stolen, are at a heightened risk of identity theft, according to attorneys.
"Millions of customers have been affected by this data breach nationwide," said Hagens Berman Managing Partner Steve Berman. "Yet, we believe that Target delayed its response, putting its profits ahead of its consumers' interests."
"Not only did Target fail to quickly disclose notice of the data breach to consumers – the retail chain also sought to minimize the effect the data breach would have on its holiday sales by disclosing the breach only on its corporate website and not disclosing that customer PIN numbers had also been stolen," Berman continued.
"Target and other major retail chains need to realize the importance of protecting consumer information," Berman said. "We hope that this lawsuit will spur Target and other retailers to improve this protocol and encourage stricter and safer guidelines and swifter action to help protect consumer information and privacy."
The lawsuit is a proposed class action, and seeks to represent a class of all persons in the United States who shopped at a Target store and whose financial or personal information was compromised. It claims that Target's actions were negligent and additionally violated a number of state laws governing unfair business practices and the disclosure of security breaches.
Concerned consumers who made purchases at Target stores between Nov. 27, 2013, and Dec. 15, 2013, or who have received letters or emails from target indicating their information was compromised are encouraged to contact a Hagens Berman attorney by emailing Target@hbsslaw.com or calling (206) 623-7292.
Additional information about the investigation is available at http://www.hbsslaw.com/cases-and-investigations/cases/Target-Data-Breach.
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, is a consumer-rights class-action law firm with offices in nine cities. The firm has been named to the National Law Journal's Plaintiffs' Hot List seven times. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at www.hbsslaw.com. The firm's class-action law blog is located at www.classactionlawtoday.com.
Firmani + Associates
Mark Firmani, 206-443-9357
©2012 PR Newswire. All Rights Reserved.